An Empirical Study of the Workplace Happiness of
Doctors in North Bengal
Ms. Mamata
Prasad1*, Mr. Debarshi Roy2,
Dr. Palas R. Sengupta3
1Assistant Professor, University B.T. & Evening
College, Cooch Behar
2PhD Scholar,
University of North Bengal
3Professor, Department of Commerce, University of North
Bengal
ABSTRACT:
Workplace
happiness has been recognized to be one of the major factors for increased
productivity, enhanced quality of work
and workplace efficacy . Since workplace efficacy is of prime importance
for the medical profession it is important to know if doctors are primarily
happy in their workplace and with their profession .This study dwells with the
levels of existing workplace happiness of doctors in North Bengal and examines
the factors that affect the levels of workplace happiness. The study included a
sample of 102 ( N=102) doctors from North Bengal Medical College .The study was
a descriptive research study and used the Jobs Central work happiness indicator
to measure happiness levels of the doctors involved in the study. The study
concluded that salary and interesting nature of the work were the most
important attributes that affected workplace happiness of doctors where as
safety , location of work or workload were the least important factors
affecting workplace happiness of doctors.
KEYWORDS: Work, Workplace, Happiness,
Doctors, Attribute.
INTRODUCTION:
There has been a growing recognition of the importance
of mental health in the Workplace. We spend most of the time of the day at work
and, thus, work has become one of the key determinants to our health and
happiness. Happiness at work is a
constituent for success for both the organizations as well as for the
individuals. Happy employees are generally more motivated, engaged, committed
and loyal to their employers .They are favorable and advocates for their
organization and employers and are ready to put extra efforts for the benefit
of customers (Sharon S. Andrew , 2011). Happiness in the work place contributes
many positive outcomes such as increasing productivity, quality, customer
satisfaction, creativity and innovation, flexibility, decreasing loss and
improved interpersonal relationships. .On the other hand, unhappiness
in the workplace have been associated with decreased work performance,
increased risk of accidents, increased absenteeism, sick leave, short term or
long term disability, burnout, increased job turnover rates, various health
conditions, and increased disability and health care costs (peter war, 2009).
There has
been a growing recognition of the importance of mental health in the Workplace.
We spend most of the time of the day at work and, thus, work has become one of
the key determinants to our health and happiness. Happiness at work is a
constituent for success for both the organizations as well as for the
individuals. Happy employees are generally more motivated, engaged, committed
and loyal to their employers .They are favorable and advocates for their
organization and employers and are ready to put extra efforts for the benefit
of customers (Sharon S. Andrew , 2011).
Happiness
in the work place contributes many positive outcomes such as increasing
productivity, quality, customer satisfaction, creativity and innovation,
flexibility, decreasing loss and improved interpersonal relationships. .On the
other hand, unhappiness in the workplace have been associated with decreased work performance, increased risk of
accidents, increased absenteeism, , sick
leave, short term or long term disability, burnout, increased job turnover
rates, various health conditions, and increased disability and health care
costs (peter war, 2009). When a person joins a company he or she has high
levels of happiness but with the passage of time it declines significantly
(David Sirota). There is , therefore , a need for generating and sustaining employees’
workplace happiness. The aim of this paper is to study the degree of happiness
at work of medical professionals in North
Bengal and to identify the work attributes which make them happy at work place.
REVIEW OF
LITERATURE:
Happiness has been in the focus of attention of
both psychologists and sociologists for many decades (Xanthopoulo
, 2010). Past researches have
demonstrated a strong relationship between happiness and workplace success.
Boehm and Lyubomirsky
(2008) posited that happy and satisfied individuals are relatively more
successful in the workplace; compared to their unhappy peers and if employees
are happy they tend to be more productive, generate new innovative ideas, try
to do the same job with different innovative methods to save time and enhance
effectiveness. Daryl S. Famacion-quinco
(2012) studied workplace happiness of La Salle University administrators. The
study involved the members of the President’s operations council of La Salle
University for Academic Year 2010-2011.
Results showed that 50 percent of the administrators of La Salle
University were happy at work. They were mostly of women in the age range of
30-39 years old who were tenured and secured with their job status. The
greatest factor that affected the level of happiness of the administrators were
the belief that they were doing something worthwhile and the least that
affected their happiness was competitive salary.
Dr. Noelle Nelson , clinical psychologist
in her book : Make More Money by Making Your
Employees Happy, shows that effective
appreciation of employee
value return more than triple time on equity and assets than the firms that don’t.
Organizations, globally, therefore are focusing on making their
employees happy. Dr. Nelson, in her book also states that when employees feel
that the company takes care for their interest; the employees will also care
for company’s interests. This may result into putting of extra efforts for the
betterment of the company.
Studies by Iverson, Olekalns,
and Erwin ( 1998) indicate that social support from colleagues and
supervisors cause people to be happy
where as Cropanzano and Wright( 1999 ) in their study
found that favorable evaluations by a
superior made workers happy.V. Gupta ( 2012) and George ( 1991) found that Helping fellow workers in the
workplace causes a person to be happy. Smith, Geoffrey (1995), the United Nations Educational,
Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) and a Spanish research
company identified environment, security, lifestyle, and cleanliness as the
factors of happiness for Europeans.
Sodikoff, Charles L (2010), showed that investment
in physician service help the organization to increase job happiness.
Appointment of nurse and accountant reduce doctors work load and free them from
administrative work and help them to concentrate their work and hence increase
happiness. Promotions of an environment of inter action with other experts
doctors also help to increase happiness quotients of work place. Mr. Rajnish Ratna, Ms. Aditi Gupta and Ms. Saniya Chawla (2011) studied the level of Job Happiness Quotient
(JHQ) of bank officers and make a comparative study between private and public
banks in Delhi. In their exploratory research they collected data from the
employees of four different banks of fifty employees (35 middle +15senior level
officers) each i.e. from 200-respondent.
They used a standardized questionnaire which was taken from Test Business
Today, 1996. Researchers proved that the
JHQ level in the private sector banks was higher than those in public sector
and identified that sense of accomplishment, ambition; working hours, stress
work environment, age and compensation have an impact on the job happiness.
Dr Ritika Jain (2012) surveyed the executives job Happiness
Quotient in realm of Rajasthan State Mines and Minerals. The survey was
conducted with the help of questionnaire which consisted of 71 questions. 14
factors and 30 sub factors. The questionnaire covered various issues that were
relevant to the organization, some of which required management intervention
and some of which related directly to the workgroup. The factors included
company, leadership, job, reward and recognition, communication, teamwork,
training and development, physical environment, social environment, job
security and advancement, goal, improvement orientation, compensation,
grievance redressal and conflict resolution. Her
findings revealed that Executives of Mining, Mechanical, Research, Material, PandA were happy. Executives of Mining were happiest of
all. Executives of Finance, Beneficiation and Electrical department were
overall unhappy. Based on her analysis she suggested that to increase the
executives happiness level actions should be taken for up gradation and
renovation of flats and quarters allotment and construction of new flats. More
doctors and nurses should be appointed in hospital and better provisions should
be made to improve housekeeping, water coolers, air conditioner, urinals and
washrooms and also attention should be paid to provide improved quality of food
items and fresh and hot meals in canteen.
There
should be transparency in reward system and revisit current reward and recognition
system for improvement. Indian Express
survey revealed that stress had become a normal part of life of major (61 per
cent) employees in Pune. The survey found that
unhealthy work place was the main reason
of employee unhappiness and it was suggested that recognizing faults at work
and taking corrective action were the most preferred option to cope with
stress. Over the years lot of studies
have been indentified the factors of employees work place happiness of profit
seeking organizations. In this study may be the first time
an attempt is made to find out the
work attributes which are responsible for doctors work place happiness who are
serving in the medical college under
west Bengal government.
RESEARCH
OBJECTIVES:
The present study was conducted to achieve
the following objectives:
1.To identify the level of happiness at work
place of doctors working in West Bengal medical colleges
2.To identify the work attributes that affect
their happiness at work.
METHODOLOGY:
The study was
a descriptive survey study with no intervention. The sample was selected
through simple random sampling method.
One hundred two doctors were selected as the sample from North Bengal
Medical College. In this study the primary data was collected from the
doctors who are working in north Bengal medical college, thorough standardized
questionnaires . The study was carried
out through Jobs Central Work Happiness Indicator to get information about
doctors’ work place happiness The Jobs Central Work Happiness Indicator
measured work place happiness which uses a 100-point scoring scale. Where
respondents were presented with a list of twelve items common work-related
attributes that they are required to
rank in the order of importance (1 for highest importanc
12 for lowest importance).Next, respondents were required to assign a
satisfaction score (1 = absolutely not satisfied 10 = totally satisfied) to
each of these attributes. Each work attribute is then tabulated with a weighted
score and mapped into a 100-point scale. The higher the score, the happier an
employer is considered to be. The
questionnaires are comprised of forced-choice and self-reported responses. The
self-report questionnaire was divided into two main sections. The first section
asked for demographic information including gender, age, years of experience in
service and hest educational degree attained. The second section of the
questionnaire requested information regarding the work place happiness.
DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION:
This
was an empirical study and used a a set of
questionnaires to gather and examine
data to explore degree of happiness and factors of happiness of doctors at
their work. The data analyses obtained from respondents were presented in table
forms. These data include the frequency and percentage. The data gathered were
analyzed using the descriptive statistics. The answers for the happiness
questionnaire were interpreted using the following 1-20 Point= very unhappy, 21-40 Point=
moderately unhappy, 41-60 Point = Neutral ,61- 80 point = Moderately happy about work and 81-100 point = very
happy at work.
Table-
1 Summary of Demographic Data (N = 102)
|
Variables |
frequency |
Percentage |
|
Gender Male Female Age Range
25-30 31-40 41-50 >50 Education Bachelor’s Master’s Years as Doctors 1–3 4–7 8–11 > 11 |
86 62 19 15 6 42 60 61 14 08 19 |
84.31 15.69 60.78 18.63 14.71 5.88 41.18 58.82 59.80 13.73 7.84 18.63 |
Demographic Data:
The demographic data in Table -1 provide the
frequency and percentage. For the total sample, 86 of 102 are male and 16 are
female. It reveals that there are more males respondents (84.31%) than females
(15.69%). Table 1 also reveals that
there are more respondents within the ages of 25 to 30 years (60.78%) followed
by those within the ages of 31 to 40 years (18.63%), while the lowest age range
falls between ages 50 above (5.88%). This indicates that the majority of the
doctors who participated in this study are a younger age group, as 79.41% are below
the age of 40. As regards education level 58.85% of the respondents have post
graduate degree. 56.25% of female doctor have post graduation degree. In
addition; only 18.63% of the respondents have experience of more than eleven
years.
Table-2
reveals the degree of happiness of medical professionals and its relation with
demographic variables. We see that 40% doctors are moderately happy, these
individuals lack enthusiasm and are not actively and productively engaged with
the work. 32% are neutral and only ten percent doctors are satisfied with their
job and actively engaged with their profession. 9.8%
of the doctors are moderately unhappy but there is hope that with positive
changes in the workplace the situation can improve. 7.8% do doctors are very unhappy with their
profession and lack enthuses. The survey sheet shows that Out of very unhappy
doctors 50% are (4/8) female and the percentage of very happy female doctor is
only 6% (1/16). Male doctors (68.61) are found to be slightly happier at work as
compared to female employees (44.43). Male employees are also happier than the
average individual (57.85).
Table-2 Degree of Happiness of Doctors and
demographic profile
|
Degree of happiness |
Very unhappy |
Moderately unhappy |
Neutral |
Moderately happy |
Very happy |
|
|
Percentage |
7.8 |
9.8 |
32.4 |
40.20 |
9.8 |
|
|
Education |
Bachelor |
2.9 |
1.9 |
11.7 |
19.6 |
4.9 |
|
Master |
4.9 |
7.9 |
20.7 |
20.6 |
4.9 |
|
|
Age |
Upto30 |
1.9 |
6 |
16.8 |
29.4 |
5.9 |
|
31-40 |
1 |
1.9 |
8.8 |
4.9 |
1.9 |
|
|
41-50 |
4.9 |
0 |
3.9 |
4.9 |
1 |
|
|
>50 |
0 |
1.9 |
2.9 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
Experience |
1-3 |
1.9 |
6.9 |
19.7 |
25.5 |
4 |
|
4-7 |
1 |
1 |
4.9 |
5.9 |
2 |
|
|
8-11 |
2 |
0 |
2.9 |
2.9 |
1.9 |
|
|
>11 |
2.9 |
1.9 |
4.9 |
5.9 |
1.9 |
|
Education is found not to significantly
affect happiness, 4.9% doctors with bachelor and master degrees are
happiest. 4.9% Doctors with master
degree and 2.9% doctors with bachelor degree are very unhappy in their profession.
Post graduate doctors are unhappier than bachelor doctors this may be lack of
proper advancement opportunities in the profession.
In table-1
we see that 79% of the doctors are young and among the very happy doctors 80%
doctors are below the age group of forty where as only 20% doctors are above
forty years in the group of very happy doctors. The happiest age group is the
under 31’s at 5.9 per cent, who are no doubt excited as they start to build a
career. Younger doctors are happier than older doctors. It
could be that the doctors in this age group are young, full of energy and
positive outlook in life that they are able to appreciate almost anything and
everything around them. Those who are least happy are doctors in their
40’s (4.9%) who face the prospect of working for at least another 20 years.
These doctors may be feeling that they are not aligning to the work assigned to
them.
(Sharon S. Andrew , 2011).
It has been
found that early years’ happiness falls drastically in a person’s 40’s. The
level of happiness is higher in a person’s younger years, but tends to hit
bottom in the mid 40’s. This Happiness Curve, however, can be restricted by
taking positive action that will keep life/work stability tipped to the upper
reaches of the curve.
In case of work experience also junior (4%)
doctors are happier than senior (1.9%) doctors. Young doctors are happier than
older doctors. This could be
since they are new to the institution; they are still so full of creativity and
energy to show that they are a good asset to the college. They are still on the
stage of giving the college a good reason that they belong and is serving in
the medicine. The table also gives information that among the very unhappy
doctors 2.9% have experience of more than eleven years of service in the
profession. .Among the very
unhappy doctors 4.9% are having work experience above eight years and 2% are
with one to seven years in profession. In this survey we find that age,
education and work experience has no affect on happiness at work.
Table-3 the work attributes by importance
|
Rank |
Most Important Work Attributes |
Score (out of 12) |
|
1 |
Salary |
8.44 |
|
2 |
Interesting work |
8.11 |
|
3 |
Work life balance |
7.39 |
|
4 |
Positive impact to society |
7.04 |
|
5 |
Autonomy at work |
6.78 |
|
6 |
Job security |
6.41 |
|
7 |
Advancement opportunities |
6.24 |
|
8 |
Good relation with
Management |
5.9 |
|
9 |
Good relation with
colleague |
5.53 |
|
10 |
Safe working condition |
5.47 |
|
11 |
Location Of Work |
5.23 |
|
12 |
Acceptable Work Demand |
5.08 |
In table-3 we see the
order of work attributes according to their importance of happiness at work as
ranked by respondents. The five most important work attributes were salary,
interesting work, work life balance, positive impact to society and autonomy at
work. 24.5 percent of doctors ranked
Salary as the most important work attributes of happiness, giving it the
highest score of 8.63 (out of a maximum score of 12) . The
surveys also shows interesting work to the second position and are chosen by
23.5 percent of respondents to be their most important work attribute. Work
life balance rank to 3rd place with a score of 7.39. Acceptable work demand is
ranked the least important work attribute with score 5.08 out of 12.On the
above score table from the next least important attribute location of work
which scored 5.23 points .This means
that the internal factors (salary) were more responsible for their work place
happiness which they would get from service rather than the environment that they are working in.
More than
one quarter of doctors (30.4 percent) rated job securities (7.12 out of 10) at
the highest level of satisfaction.
21.6% doctors are rated their relations with their colleagues at the highest
level of satisfaction therefore placing it as the 2nd most satisfied work
attribute (6.87 out of 10). Acceptable work demands and safe working condition
also come among the top 5 most satisfied work attributes with 24.5 percent
giving it a high satisfaction rating (6.4 out of 10).
While
autonomy and interesting work are highly valued by doctors as most important
work attributes respectively, both attributes scored the least in terms of
satisfaction levels. 8.8 percent of doctors rated autonomy at the lowest level
of satisfaction making it the least satisfied work attributes (score of 5.49
out of 10). Meanwhile, interesting work achieved the second lowest satisfaction
score (5.68 out of 10) with 25.4% of doctors. 15.47% doctors reporting that
they are not contented with the advance opportunities of their current jobs.
Good relation with management ranked the 5th spot of dissatisfaction level.
Table-4 most
satisfied to dissatisfied Work attributes
|
Attribute |
Score |
|
Job security |
7.12 |
|
Good relations
with colleagues |
6.87 |
|
Acceptable work
demands |
6.4 |
|
Location of
work |
6.4 |
|
Safe working
conditions |
6.4 |
|
Salary |
6.35 |
|
Work-life
balance |
6.03 |
|
Good relations
with management |
5.83 |
|
Positive impact
to society |
5.76 |
|
Advancement
opportunities |
5.74 |
|
Interesting
work |
5.68 |
|
Autonomy at
work |
5.49 |
The survey
sheet show that job securities, acceptable work demands, salary, good relation
with colleague and interesting work are the work attributes on which female
doctors happiness depends very much and advancement opportunities, safe working
condition, relation with management, autonomy at work and location of work
place are the attributes which they are very much dissatisfied. The results of
the survey show positive levels of satisfaction with regards to interpersonal
relations at the workplace. What we find in this survey is that most satisfied
work attribute were different from the attributes which the doctors considered
most important for their happiness at work. This means that respondents were
not satisfied with important factors which they ranked important for happiness
at work. This indicates that for the doctors to improve their
level of happiness in their workplace, changes should be done in line to the following
areas where the doctors feel that they are not satisfied currently as they
answered the survey sheet.
Recommendations: Following are the
some measures to ensure the medical doctors happiness:-
·
A proper salary package is the first and foremost requirement for
ensuring work place happiness of
medical professionals.
· Doctors
should be provided with meaningful work with restructuring of positions if
necessary and possible.
· There
should be involvement of doctors for arrangements of duty time so that they can
maintain their work life balance.
· The
provision of a workplace, which is co operative and safe are essential for
happiness at work.
· An
atmosphere that gives autonomy at work should
be available and doctors are given the
freedom to take action, explaining why assignments are important to the
accomplishment.
· Providing
opportunities for challenging assignments, considering reassignments so that
doctors’ strengths align with position requirements, should use full range of
knowledge and skills.
Implications
of the Study:
People are spending most of their lives in their working
environments. Therefore, this study is relevant because it tackles the issue of
happiness in the workplace Findings of the study will help the top authority to know the problem areas
which is leading to unhappiness among doctors and hence declining their
performances. This study gives a scope to know and understand the happiness and
satisfaction level of doctors in the medical colleges. Top Authority can
use the finding of this study to develop interventions and strategies for
improvement.
Limitations:
The study had undergone certain
limitations. Positive response ratio was
very less. Due to time constrained for most of the doctors less number of
doctors reply truly. Also, sample size was another major issue due to which
analysis part lacked statistical tools.
In this study, it is not possible to say
that we have had an error free sample, doctors were selected at random.
The present research is being confined to
the data collection from one medical college only and hence the results
obtained cannot safely be generalized. Increasing the scope of it by bringing
in more medical colleges in the survey and increasing the sample size can
further extend this study and give a wider application. . However, this study
helps us to indentify the factors responsible for happiness of the doctors who
are working in medical colleges of West Bengal.
SUMMARY AND
CONCLUSION:
Happiness
has a great role to play in work performance. More happiness- higher
satisfaction and higher satisfaction means higher performance. Besides this
happiness at work also affects organizational citizenship, absenteeism and
turnover and is predator of work behavior. It is observed that individuals who
find their lives rewarding and fulfilling are generally more successful in the
workplace. Happy individuals are likely
to be more proactive and resilient to adverse situations and less prone to stress
symptoms. Happiness creates passion among individuals for their work. Happy
doctors are crucial to the future success of health care institution and that
building on what makes doctor in their profession is more effective than just
fixing what makes them unhappy. Thus, doctors who enjoy good salary and working
relationships, receive autonomy at work, balance work life and feel valued by
organization are likely to be happy. The Doctors who are happy in their works
likely to be contributing the most to service and would send positive message
to Society and enhance institution brand. Thus it is important for authority to
take care of their happiness to enhance the work efficiency and level of
patients’ satisfaction.
REFERENCES:
Boehm, K. Julia
and Lyubomirsky,Sonja. (2008),“Does Happiness Promote
Caree Success?”, Journal of Career Assessment 16(1), 101-116.
Cropanzano, R., and Wright,T. A. (1999), A 5-year study of change in the
relationship between wellbeing and job performance., Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, (51), 252-265.
David Sirota,
Louis A. Mischkind, and Michael Irwin Meltz (2005) ,The Enthusiastic Employee: How Companies Profit by Giving Workers What They Want,
Wharton School Publishing.
George, J. M. (1991). State or trait: Effects of
positive mood on prosocial behaviors at work. Journal of Applied Psychology , (76).
Haring M J.,Stock W A., andnd Okum M A. (1984), A research synthesis of gender and social
class as correlates of subjective well-being. Human Relations, (37) 645–657.
Iverson, R. D.,Olekalns, M., and Erwin, P. J. (1998), Affectivity,
organizational stressors, and absenteeism: A causal model of burnout and its
consequences, Journal of Vocational
Behavior, 52, 1-23.
Lyubomirsky, Sonja; King,
Laura; Diener, Ed. (2005)” The Benefits of Frequent
Positive Affect: Does Happiness Lead to Success?”, Psychological Bulletin, 131(6),
pp.803-85.
Myers, D.G. and Diener, E. (1995), Who Is Happy? Psychological Science, 6(1), pp1017.
Noelle
C Nelson (2012) , Make More Money by Making
Your Employees Happy [Kindle Edition], MindLab Publishing.
Peter Warr (2009) , Work,
Happiness, and Unhappiness, Cognitive
Behavioral Therapy Book Reviews, 5(
5) .
Rafaeli A, Sutton RI
(1989), The expression of emotion in organizational life. In Cummings LL and Staw BM (eds), Research in organizational Behaviour, 11
.
Mr. Rajnish Ratna ,Ms. Aditi Gupta ,Ms. Saniya Chawla (2011) Job Happiness Quotient in the Banking Sector,
Journal of Applied Management and Computer
Science, Volume 3 – August
Dr Ritika Jain (2012) , Employee Job Happiness Quotient in
realm of RSMML, Indian Journal of Applied Research,vol.2,Issue
3
Seligman MCand Csikszentmihalyi M (2000), Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5–14
Sharon S. Andrew , 2011, S.M.I.L.E.S.1: The
Differentiating Quotient for Happiness at Work, www.happiestmind.com
Sodikoff, Charles L.
(2010), How to bring up the Happiness Quotient by investing in your practice, Medical Economics, Vol. 87, Issue 13,
p-23.
Smith, Geoffrey (1995),” The happiness
quotient.” Successful Meetings,
Vol.44 Issue 3, p24, 1/7p
Vibhuti Gupta, Importance
of Being Happy at Work (2012), International
Journal of Research and Development -
A Management Review (IJRDMR), Volume-1, Issue – 1.
Xanthopoulou, Despoina, Bakker, Arnold B.and Ilies, Remus. (2010),The life of
a happy worker: Examining short-term fluctuations in employee happiness and
well-being. Human Relations, 63,
301-3
Websites
www.erlbaum.com
http://gmj.gallup.com/content/20770/gallup-study-feeling-good-matters-in-the.aspx12
January 2006.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/stevecooper/2012/07/30/make-more-money-by-making-your-employees-happy/
http://www.greatplacetowork.in/storage/documents/Indias_Best_
Companies_to_Work_For_-_2012_Study_-_Information_Brochure.pdf
http://www.happinessclub.com/FairfieldCitizen/012104.htm
http://positivesharing.com/2007/03/top-10-reasons-why-happiness-at-work-is-the-ultimate-productivity-booster
,
www.positive workplace.com
Received on 08.12.2015
Modified on 12.01.2016
Accepted on 20.02.2016
© A&V Publications all
right reserved
Research J. Humanities and Social Sciences.
7(2): April - June, 2016, 75-81.
DOI: 10.5958/2321-5828.2016.00013.9